NIST AI RMF assessment with SWT3 witness anchor citations. GOVERN / MAP / MEASURE / MANAGE function-level findings.
AI Risk Management Assessment Report
AI 100-1 -- Function-Level Risk Assessment
Organization Assessed: Athena Logistics Inc.
AI System: SupplyGuard v4.1 (Supply Chain Anomaly Detection)
Risk Profile: High impact -- critical infrastructure supply chain decisions
Assessment Body: Pacific Risk Advisory LLC
Assessment ID: PRA-2026-0312
Assessment Standard: NIST AI RMF (AI 100-1, January 2023)
Report Date: 2026-10-06
Assessment Window: 2026-07-15 through 2026-10-01 (78 days)
This assessment evaluates Athena Logistics' implementation of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework across all four core functions (GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE) for their SupplyGuard v4.1 system. SupplyGuard is an anomaly detection engine used to identify supply chain disruptions across 14 distribution centers serving federal logistics contracts.
MANAGED WITH IDENTIFIED GAPS. 3 of 4 RMF functions are substantially addressed. One gap identified in MANAGE (incident reporting not yet operational). One area for improvement in MEASURE (adversarial testing scope).
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Procedures Assessed | 16 |
| Addressed | 14 |
| Gaps Identified | 1 |
| Areas for Improvement | 1 |
| SWT3 Anchors Verified | 20 (5 independently recomputed) |
| Assessment Window | 2026-07-15 through 2026-10-01 (78 days) |
This assessment was conducted per PRA internal procedure PRA-QMS-P-008 "AI Risk Management Assessment Using Cryptographic Evidence" (Rev 1.0, effective 2026-06-01), aligned with NIST AI RMF (AI 100-1) and NIST AI RMF Playbook guidance.
SWT3 witness anchors were verified using a two-step process:
sovereign.tenova.io/verify. Each returned VALID.The SWT3 fingerprint formula is implemented in 7 independent SDK implementations and verified against a shared test vector suite. Independent recomputation used OpenSSL 3.x, confirming vendor-independent reproducibility.
The assessment window was defined as 2026-07-15 through 2026-10-01 (78 days). Of the 16 procedures assessed, 14 had continuous anchor coverage. Two procedures (AI-REDTEAM.1 and AI-INCIDENT.1) had absent coverage, documented in the MEASURE and MANAGE findings below.
SWT3 anchors were accepted as sufficient evidence for automated monitoring and operational control objectives. Governance structure, organizational culture, and stakeholder engagement objectives were assessed through document review and interviews. Where both sources covered the same objective, both were considered.
Subcategories assessed: GOVERN 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 2.1
| Procedure | Anchor | Verified | Witness Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI-GOV.1 (Governance Attestation) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIGOV1-PASS-1790841600-d4e7f1a2b836 |
VALID (recomputed) | 2026-09-28 |
| AI-GOV.2 (Review Cadence) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIGOV2-PASS-1790755200-a1c3e8f7b294 |
VALID | 2026-09-27 |
| AI-GOV.5 (Accountability Assignment) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIGOV5-PASS-1790668800-f8b2c6d1e453 |
VALID | 2026-09-26 |
Supplementary evidence: Interview with Chief Risk Officer (PRA-INT-0312-01) confirmed quarterly governance reviews and board-level AI risk reporting. AI governance charter reviewed and found comprehensive.
Subcategories assessed: MAP 1.1, 2.1, 2.3, 3.5
| Procedure | Anchor | Verified | Witness Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI-RISK.1 (Risk Identification) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIRISK1-PASS-1790582400-c7d3e9f2a178 |
VALID (recomputed) | 2026-09-25 |
| AI-FAIR.1 (Bias Detection) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIFAIR1-PASS-1790496000-b4a8c1f7e302 |
VALID | 2026-09-24 |
| AI-IMPACT.1 (Rights Impact Assessment) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIIMPACT1-PASS-1790409600-e2f6b8c3d741 |
VALID | 2026-09-23 |
| AI-DATA.1 (Data Provenance) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIDATA1-PASS-1790323200-a9c4e7f1b258 |
VALID | 2026-09-22 |
Supplementary evidence: Risk register reviewed (47 entries, 12 classified high-impact). Interview with AI Engineering Lead (PRA-INT-0312-02) confirmed risk categorization methodology aligned with AI 100-1 Appendix B risk categories.
Subcategories assessed: MEASURE 2.5, 2.6, 3.1
| Procedure | Anchor | Verified | Witness Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI-DRIFT.1 (Drift Detection) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIDRIFT1-PASS-1790236800-d1e5f9a3c782 |
VALID | 2026-09-21 |
| AI-PERF.1 (Performance Monitoring) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIPERF1-PASS-1790150400-b8c2f4a7e136 |
VALID (recomputed) | 2026-09-20 |
| AI-GRD.1 (Guardrail Enforcement) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIGRD1-PASS-1790064000-f3a7c9e1b452 |
VALID | 2026-09-19 |
| AI-EXPL.1 (Explainability) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIEXPL1-PASS-1789977600-c6d8e2f4a193 |
VALID | 2026-09-18 |
| AI-REDTEAM.1 (Adversarial Testing) | Not witnessed during assessment window. Last campaign: 2026-03-15. | ||
Assessor notes: The continuous SWT3 evidence for AI-DRIFT.1 and AI-PERF.1 across 78 days provides strong assurance of ongoing monitoring (MEASURE 2.5). The absence of AI-REDTEAM.1 within the window does not indicate non-compliance but limits the assessor's ability to evaluate MEASURE 2.6 (adversarial robustness) with current evidence.
Subcategories assessed: MANAGE 1.3, 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1
| Procedure | Anchor | Verified | Witness Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI-HITL.1 (Human Override) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIHITL1-PASS-1789891200-e4f8a2c6b317 |
VALID | 2026-09-17 |
| AI-HITL.2 (Override Effectiveness) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AIHITL2-PASS-1789804800-a3b7c1d5e928 |
VALID (recomputed) | 2026-09-16 |
| AI-LCM.1 (Lifecycle Management) | SWT3-E-VULTR-AI-AILCM1-PASS-1789718400-f1c4e7a9b263 |
VALID | 2026-09-15 |
| AI-INCIDENT.1 (Incident Reporting) | Not witnessed during assessment window. Plan drafted but not implemented. | ||
Supplementary evidence: Interview with Head of Supply Chain Operations (PRA-INT-0312-03) confirmed human override procedures are exercised monthly. Incident response plan (draft v0.9) reviewed but found incomplete -- no escalation thresholds, no notification timelines, no post-incident review process.
Suggested action: Implement AI incident reporting mechanism per MANAGE 4.1. Complete incident response plan with escalation thresholds, notification timelines, and post-incident review procedures. Conduct at least one tabletop exercise. Target: 60 days (2026-12-05).
| ID | RMF Function | Classification | Description | Target Date | Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAP-001 | MANAGE 4.1 | GAP IDENTIFIED | Implement AI incident reporting mechanism. Complete incident response plan with escalation thresholds, notification timelines, and post-incident review procedures. Conduct tabletop exercise. | 2026-12-05 | Chief Risk Officer, Athena Logistics |
| ID | RMF Function | Description | Suggested Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMP-001 | MEASURE 2.6 | Adversarial testing conducted annually but not within the assessment window. | Increase red team frequency to semi-annual given critical infrastructure classification. |
| Procedure | Anchor (Truncated) | Verification Method | Result | Verified On |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-GOV.1 | ...d4e7f1a2b836 | SHA-256 recomputation (OpenSSL 3.x) | MATCH | 2026-10-03 |
| AI-RISK.1 | ...c7d3e9f2a178 | SHA-256 recomputation (OpenSSL 3.x) | MATCH | 2026-10-03 |
| AI-PERF.1 | ...b8c2f4a7e136 | SHA-256 recomputation (OpenSSL 3.x) | MATCH | 2026-10-03 |
| AI-HITL.2 | ...a3b7c1d5e928 | SHA-256 recomputation (OpenSSL 3.x) | MATCH | 2026-10-03 |
| AI-FAIR.1 | ...b4a8c1f7e302 | SHA-256 recomputation (OpenSSL 3.x) | MATCH | 2026-10-03 |
Remaining 15 anchors were verified via the public verifier at sovereign.tenova.io/verify. All returned VALID.
Risk Posture: MANAGED WITH IDENTIFIED GAPS
SupplyGuard v4.1 demonstrates substantial alignment with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework across GOVERN, MAP, and MEASURE functions. One gap (GAP-001) was identified in the MANAGE function regarding incident reporting. One area for improvement was noted regarding adversarial testing frequency.
The assessment body recommends:
The use of SWT3 cryptographic witness evidence provided continuous assurance over the 78-day window for 14 of 16 procedures assessed, offering stronger temporal coverage than periodic manual evaluations.
SWT3 witness anchors cited in this report follow the format:
Any anchor can be independently verified at sovereign.tenova.io/verify with no account or authentication. The SHA-256 fingerprint formula is published in the SWT3 Protocol Specification and can be recomputed using any standard cryptographic library.